3/24/06

Pigs are flying and it's snowing in hell: Jewpoint gives a Yasher Koach to Prof. Dershowitz.

Astute (and patient) JewPoint readers will recall that we excoriated Prof. D. 2 years ago for whining about being attacked and for being called a nazi by leftists and pro-jihadis, especially because "It was irrelevant to these chanters that I also support a Palestinian state, the end of the Israeli occupation and the dismantling of most of the settlements.

Earlier this week, when we wrote about the Harvard jihadists in the School of Govt that
".... (*Many others have already noted that the authors' "research" is mirrored on the thousands of rabid Jew- hating and jihad-supporting websites scattered all over the WWW)."...
Who knew that Prof. D would be doing the heavy lifting?

Here's hoping that he eventually makes the connection between "saving Israel by destroying the settlements" and the plans of the sand-nazis and their over-educated allies in academia.
Harvard's Paper on Israel
Drew From Neo-Nazi Sites


By MEGHAN CLYNE
Staff Reporter of the Sun
March 24, 2006


WASHINGTON - A prominent Harvard law professor, Alan Dershowitz, is alleging that the authors of a Harvard Kennedy School paper about the "Israel lobby," one of which is the Kennedy School's academic dean, culled sections of the paper from neo-Nazi and other anti-Israel hate Web sites.

"What we're discovering first of all is that the quotes that they use are not only wrenched out of context, but they are the common quotes that appear on hate sites," Mr. Dershowitz, who is identified in the paper as part of the "lobby," told The New York Sun yesterday.

"The wrenching out of context is done by the hate sites,and then [the authors] cite them to the original sources, in order to disguise the fact that they've gotten them from hate sites."
Full story in the NY Sun can be found by clicking here.

Yasher Koach, Prof. Dershowitz.




**************

Share Your Jewpoint.
If this page resonated with you, please share it with someone who will appreciate it.  Simply click a button below to share this page via Facebook, email, or your favorite blog, social media, or bookmark service. 
**************

3/21/06

New Mideast Analysis by Osama's Men at Harvard!

"The Israel Lobby"

"Too many Joos! We blame them for everything!"
by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
in the London Review of Books Vol. 28 No. 6 dated 23 March 2006

Not to be outdone by Yale admitting a high-ranking and unrepentant Taliban who excused jihadi execution of women kneeling in soccer fields by claiming "...There were also executions in Texas...", Harvard now unleashes both barrels at the Jews. Jews who love America, Jews who don't want to see Israel destroyed, and even Jews who keep giving heavily to Harvard's endowment fund.

This piece by two advocates of the limiting of American aid to (and ultimately, aiming for the destruction of) Israel can be summed up and rebutted quite briefly.

The authors never address a central question: which would benefit America more: Israel looking increasingly like her Arab neighbors, or the reverse?

Their failure to ask that question before they began their regurgitation* of years of pro--baathist, pro-leftist, anti-Christian, and anti-Jewish jeremiads reveals them to be either so intellectually shallow and/or blinded by their hatred of all things American and Christian and Jewish, that they prefer that Israel be destroyed and replaced by the muslim dictators found in almost all of the surrounding Arab "nations".

(*Many others have already noted that the authors' "research" is mirrored on the thousands of rabid Jew- hating and jihad-supporting websites scattered all over the WWW).

Looking at one of the authors "credits", we also note that:
Stephen Walt is the Robert and Renee Belfer Professor of International Affairs at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. His most recent book is Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy.
Not only does Professor Walt believe that America shouldn't be a global leader, but it seems he believes that the U.S. needs to be "tamed." In other words, he would prefer that other nations dominate the global stage; he is probably very upset with America's disgust with a UN Human Rights Council that has been led by such stalwarts of freedom such as Syria, Lybia and the Sudan.

So when Professor Walt and his co-author write that support for Israel is not in America's interest, we have to ask, when did he or his partner ever have America's best interests at heart?

Finally, these two geniuses from Harvard neglect to inform their readers exactly what benefits would accrue to America should we withdraw our support from Israel.

One obvious result of a reduction of American support would be to force Israel into an even deeper war economy to fight for her survival, with the concomitant reduction in Israeli research that has lead to major benefits for America, including the co-development of Intel and Motorola chips, along with the invention of instant messenger software used in computers and cell phones, technologies in use in not only in America but also used in most of the world's computers.

America (and the world) could also forget about the thousands of drug patents developed in Israel. I am sure that the authors believe that these could all be developed by the Arab world...

There is also the likely scenario that without American pressure on the common enemies faced by Israel and the U.S., the Israelis would conclude that their only safe option after further Arab attacks would be to conduct wholesale bombing on and inflict massive destruction of their enemies infrastructure (read "oil production" & "the Suez Canal").

One can only speculate, but possibly the authors privately support this as a method of Arab population control.

Finally, the authors neglect the entire issue of worldwide Islamic-fundamentalism and its multi-century (and koran-sanctioned) method and pattern of "accepting" surrender of infidels on the battlefield:

Without exception, for over thirteen centuries, any and every Islamic victory has always led to and would lead to new and further attacks on Islam's next target.

Islamo-fascist terror is spreading around the globe. If these two professors are not the paid agents of same, they certainly deserve the accolades of those who desire to spread Sharia and further Islamic-generated destruction.

As for the rest of us, we can only promise to never hire any Harvard graduate who has not publicly spoken out against these two shills for Osama Bin Laden.


**************
Share Your Jewpoint.
If this page resonated with you, please share it with someone who will appreciate it.  Simply click a button below to share this page via Facebook, email, or your favorite blog, social media, or bookmark service. 
**************

7/23/04

Jewish Dims get ready to R Fumble!

The backward looking Forward reports:

In more NJDC news, the new campaign button that the group has produced for the Democratic National Convention in Boston next week features a resolute-looking headshot of Kerry over the slogan "The Real Deal," next to a silly-looking photo of Bush over the word "Schlemiel," the Yiddish word for "sad sack."

Savvy JewPointers don't have to look very far to see which candidate is running with Arafat's current blessing and money donated by jihadists out to destroy Israel and America.

Arafat fundraising for Demorat Cynthia Mckinney

And they don't have to look far to see which Dem President spent more time with Arafat than his own national security advisers (was Sandy in training to steal documents then?) and not only brought us the Oslocide that killed almost 1000 Jews and injured thousands more, and is still fantasizing about and publicizing his efforts to destroy Israel. Clinton as Barnum: There's a Jewish sucker voting in every election.

To be fair, the Forward started the article with a challenge from the Dims to debate Repubs on Israel:

The glove was first taken off and the duel announced with this press release: Jewish Dems Challenge Bush-Cheney to Jewish Community Debates Nationwide

U.S. Newswire ^ | 7/20/04
Contact: David A. Harris of the National Jewish Democratic Council, 202-216-9060 / info@njdc.org

WASHINGTON, July 20 -- The National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC) today challenged the Bush/Cheney campaign to a series of issue debates in Jewish communities across the country. The NJDC announced that more than 20 Democratic members of the U.S. House and Senate have agreed to participate in debates in key battleground states; additionally, invitations are being sent today to Jewish Community Relations Councils and other Jewish institutions across the country to host the debates.

Our first response? They want debates? THEY CAN'T HANDLE DEBATES! They couldn't handle Arafat for eight years, and now we're expected to trust them to not hand over Israel as appeasement to Osama?
"The American Jewish community deserves an open debate about the issues of deep concern to the American Jewish community -- about the very real differences that exist between the two presidential tickets," said National Jewish Democratic Council Executive Director Ira N. Forman.
Sure, Ira, here's a difference: Pres. Bush wants to kill any terrorist who doesn't lay down their arms, and John Kerry wants to throw his medals at him while inviting the French and Germans to re carve up the middle east to serve French and German interests. And we all know that the French and the Germans have America's (and especially Jews) best interests at heart...


"Republicans have mounted an aggressive effort inside the Jewish community to misrepresent Senator John Kerry's deep, time-tested commitment to Israel's security.

John Kerry has done a good job of that all by himself, hiring Clintonoid Oslociders as his Jewish advisors.These people are not content with 1000 dead Israelis and ten of thousands more injured Jews. They need more Jewish blood to spill on their alter of appeasement. But at least they are being consistent:

John Kerry is proud of the fact that he and his friends helped force America TO RUN OUT OF VIETNAM, leaving 83,000,000 Vietnamese STILL LIVING AS SLAVES UNDER COMMUNISM.

And that's what John Kerry would do to Israel, arm-twist it back to boundaries that would leave it defenseless against arab attacks.

Finally, speaking of members of Congress who want to debate policy affecting Jews, maybe Congressman Jerry Nadler can explain why he invited THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION POSSIBLY MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR DEAD JEWS TO MONITOR OUR AMERICAN ELECTIONS!

Does Jerry think he can get a free meal out of Koffi and the UN blue helmets, while they are busy setting up permanent Hamas refugee camps ON ATLANTIC AVENUE IN BROOKLYN?

Hey, let's give Jerry a break; he is only following Kerry's lead!:

Democrats are offering nothing in John Kerry EXCEPT MORE APPEASEMENT.

Democrats should take their "social issues for secular Jews" and go hang with the far-leftists, who at least have the courage to stand up and say how they hate America and Israel.

That's right, Dims should keep whining about such important "Jewish social issues" like abortion on demand, and pushing G-d out of the Pledge of Allegiance.

THERE AREN'T ENOUGH JEWS TO BEGIN WITH and all the Dims can do is make sure that Jewish women should be able to abort 24 x 7...

This folks, is the truth about the twenty-first century Democratic party and it's relationship with American Jews.

Working hard to make sure the goyim don't say the "G" word, pumping up jihadists like Cynthia Mckinney and UN lovers like Jerry Nadler, and working to cut the Jewish birth rate as low and as fast as possible.

Arafat fundraising for Demorat Cynthia Mckinney


Cynthia Mckinney on the front page of aljazeerah.info soliciting campaign donations with Arafat's blessing.

This is, except for cropping for size, an unretouched photo from their home page. (The link in the picture goes to her web site).

Jews who keep voting for democrats remind us of the machers in the shtetls who fed the rest of the us to the Nazis: "trust me, this is good for you..."

Dr. Daniel Pipes has more info here on "Radical Islam's First Member of Congress "

Such an outpouring of extremist support comes as no shock; as Erick Stakelbeck documents in today's New York Post, "McKinney has long associated with militant Islamic groups whose members have openly supported terrorism," plus "she has taken to the floor of the House to defend them."



7/11/04

Jews who see F/9/11 ARE SUPPORTING HEZBULLAH

The company distributing filmmaker Michael Moore's Bush-bashing movie "Fahrenheit 9/11" says it won't reject an offer of help from Middle East terrorist organization Hezbollah.

As WorldNetDaily reported, terrorists affiliated with the Iran-backed network last week offered to help promote the film in the United Arab Emirates.

The movie industry publication Screen Daily reported, "In terms of marketing the film, [distributor] Front Row is getting a boost from organizations related to Hezbollah which have rung up from Lebanon to ask if there's anything they can do to support the film." The story then quotes Front Row Managing Director Gianluca Chacra: "We can't go against these organizations as they could strongly boycott the film in Lebanon and Syria."

Terror-war supporting organization Move America Forward publicized the Chacra quote and reacted strongly against it.

"Michael Moore dismisses Americans who are upset with his film and the impact it has in undermining support for the war against terrorism," said Vice Chair Melanie Morgan. "At the same time, his distribution companies are concerned about offending the sensibilities of terrorists. That certainly gives rise to asking the question: Whose side are you on?"

6/24/04

Clinton as Barnum: There's a Jewish sucker voting in every election.

Excerpted from BBC TV: THE CLINTON INTERVIEW: A PANORAMA SPECIAL [with David Dimbleby]

[Clinton]There is no deal to be made there by America or any other country unless Israel believes the interlocutor has as a bottom line condition the continued survival of the State of Israel; so yes, I do, I think President Bush can make some progress. I think after the next election, whoever wins will be able to make some progress but I think that also we have to fight for the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinians.

I think the trick is to do both and you can do both as long as the Israelis believe you're going to be there for their survival. I mean look at all the things I ask them to accept, you know, the de facto 97% of the West Bank as a state, all of the, the Temple Mount and the East Jerusalem and half the old city as Al Quds, the Palestinian capital. [yes, all non-plain formatting is JP's...]

Bill Clinton, "the first Arab president!"

NOT ONE WORD ABOUT THE CESSATION OF TERROR FROM THE ARABS.

NOT ONE WORD ABOUT INSISTING ON A NON-MILITARISED AND TERRORIST FREE NEW ARAB STATE IN THE BOSOM OF ISRAEL.

As long as you can make it a "trick" and as long as ENOUGH STUPID JEWS BELIEVE that someone else will "guarantee their survival..."

EXCUSE ME, WASN'T THAT THE SIN QUA NON OF THE RECREATION OF THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAEL?

That we could NEVER DEPEND ON and WOULD NEVER DEPEND ON another "nation" for the survival of the Jews.

Only G-d, and G-d willing, the people of the nation of Israel can "be there for their survival."

Here Monica Israel, HAVE ANOTHER CIGAR.

6/17/04

Homicide Bombers posing as college grads

Muslim members of the University of California, Irvine's graduating class will wear green sashes emblazoned with the word "shahada" in Arabic along with their commencement robes in tomorrow's ceremony - a reference some say is an incitement to violence that should not be allowed.

"Shahada" can be translated several ways, including as a declaration of faith in Islam, but it often is used in reference to "martyrdom" – especially martyrdom attained by suicide bombers.

Sally Peterson, dean of students at UCI, defended the university against critics who say the school shouldn't allow such a display.

Peterson admits the word "shahada," besides being a reference to Islam, "has also taken on many other meanings depending on where you sit. For some it is seen as 'kill all Jews' or it is seen as a reference to suicide bombers," she said.




Despite different meanings applied to the Arabic word, the administrator said UCI is not permitted to limit the Muslim Student Union members' freedom to wear the sashes. June 17, 2004 By Ron Strom © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Lets see if we can get this straight; if some UCI graduates want to wear swastikas on their sashes, that would be ok with UCI because the swastika has "other meanings depending on where you sit. " (the Hindus use it in a different context,...), and hey, a straight-arm salute from the podium, well, graduation is an exciting day, lets not limit their free speech.

How about if UCI students wore little drawings of watermelons and fried chicken on their sashes? After all, people eat those foods all the time!

If UCI students are interested in being homicide bombers, we aren't safe with them in the American workplace.

Oh, it's just the crazy muslim students? But how do we pre-screen the rest of the UCI grads to see if THEY STOOD UP AGAINST THIS GARBAGE?!

If the rest of the UCI grads are as cowardly, politically correct and/or as dangerously naive as their Dean, perhaps America needs to reconsider hiring any UCI grads.

5/14/04

JTA's puff piece on Kerry's new Jewish guy.


The call of Washington lures a Clinton man to Kerry campaign: May 12, 2004
Footlik ordered coffee and listened to the hourly news on the radio: President Bush wanted the Israeli army immediately to leave the West Bank towns where it was pursuing an aggressive campaign against Palestinian terrorists after a Passover suicide bombing killed almost 30 people.

What he didn't hear upset him even more: Where was Bush's plan to bring the parties back to peace talks?
So instead of being upset at Pres. Bush's faux complaint while Israel "was pursuing an aggressive campaign against Palestinian terrorists" Footlik wants to kibbitz a bissel more Oslocide?
"You can't say you care about the safety and security of Israelis and not be involved," Footlik said.
Actually, you can't say "you care about the safety and security of Israelis" when you are doing NOTHING TO FORCE ARABS TO STOP TERRORISM.
"Israel is less secure when our country takes a step back. That's what Bush has done for four years."
What a load of chazzerai: President Bush may have foolishly bought Tom Friedman's Saudi inspired Roadmap of Death, but at least the President had the sechel/brains to insist that there would be no new state of Terrorstine until the Arabs clamped down on terrorism.

The Arabs haven't clamped down, and notwithstanding Sharon's dog-wagging attempt to avoid indictment by handing over Gaza, Israel is not being forced by Gore-son-of-Clinton / Annan / Albright to hand over 1/2 of Jerusalem and 92% of Yesha to Yasser Arafat!

Footlik is a former member of the Clinton death-kiss crowd. To the detriment of Israel, Clinton met with Arafat MORE THAN ANY OTHER FOREIGN LEADER; to the detriment of the United States, Clinton met with Arafat more than he met with his own U.S. National Security Advisors.

Footlik and his cronies Ross, Indyk, and Berger ignored warnings that Arafat was never interested in a two state solution. Then they ignored those who noted Arafat's speech in Arabic after "the handshake" where Arafat characterized his appearance on the White House lawn as a temporary tactic.

End result? More Israeli dead and wounded.

With friends like Footlik and John Kerry, Israel could look forward to being ordered to disinter Sheik Yassin and propping him up as head of Gaza.

... His existence since 1999 - freelancing in Israel as a consultant to a number of peace-promoting groups...
Lovely... Did Footlik "consult" with the "peace-promoting groups" who urged Tzahalniks to refuse to serve, or did he speak up against the blatant sedition?

Did he set up, did he attend, or did he speak out against the meetings held by "tear down the settlements!" Ambassador Kurtzer and long-term State department Arabist William Burns, where they advised Gush Shalom and other "peace-promoting groups" on how to break up the coalition between right-thinking Jews and the hard-core, Israel-supporting Christian Right in the U.S.?

The other irony that JTA missed is that Kerry's own base doesn't appreciate his recent flip-flopping towards Israel, and they are also not particularly impressed with Footlik!

John Kerry's wife funds hundreds of anti-Israel (and anti-American) groups through her Tides Foundation. As American Jews supportive of Israel's and America's right and obligation to obliterate islamo-fascist terrorism, we don't need nor want Kerry as a President, and we don't need Footlik carrying Kerry's bitter waters.

5/3/04

From the "better late than never department".

Tonight we do a very late update and correction to an almost 4 year old post, "Spanish Continue With Self-Castration."

Your humble editor very belatedly apologizes and notes that he posted an incorrect photo, did not appropriately credit the source for that photo, and (bearer of good news finally), also sees that the Spanish relented under local pressure and did NOT remove their....

....Statue of James James, The Moor–Slayer.

The large photo in the original post below, as I have been very gently chided by a pleasant and peripatetic gentleman, "... is not of Santiago Montemores in Santiago, which is a smallish statue in a side chapel. Rather it is a large sculpture in Lagroño on the facade of the church there...[and]... is copyright by Mike Metras at www.worksandwords.com.

Here is the actual statue in question:

and as also noted above, here is the the excellent news as reported in the Telegraph, that a

"Public Outcry Forces Church to Keep Moor Slayer's Statue.":

St James the Moor Slayer, Spain's patron saint, has notched up another victory.

Church officials have been forced to overturn a decision to remove a statue of the saint from the cathedral of Santiago de Compostela in north-west Spain.

The statue, an 18th-century work by Jose Gambino which depicts St James on a white charger hacking off the heads of Moors beneath his rampant mount's hooves, was deemed to be offensive to Muslims.

However a spokesman for the church, which is Christendom's third holiest site after Rome and Jerusalem and attracts half a million pilgrims each year, said yesterday that, due to public anger over the proposed move, the statue will now remain in place.
______________
On Monday, May 03, 2004, JP posted:

Spanish continue with self-castration.

As reported by the Bin Laden Broadcasting Company on Monday, 3 May, 2004, 12:10 GMT 13:10 UK [found also at Worldnetdaily.com]
Church to remove Moor-slayer saint.

A statue in a Spanish cathedral showing St. James slicing the heads off Moorish invaders is to be removed to
avoid causing offence to Muslims.


Large sculpture in Lagroño on the facade of the church there, is NOT the statue in question: photo copyright by Mike Metras at www.worksandwords.com.

Cathedral authorities in the pilgrim city of Santiago de Compostela, on Spain's north west coast, plan to move the statue to the museum.

Among the reasons for the move is to avoid upsetting the "sensitivities of other ethnic groups".
EARTH TO SPAIN! The statue is in YOUR CHURCH! Unless you are planning on turning over your churches to Osama, who is going to be offended?
The statue of St James "the Moor-slayer" is expected to be replaced by one depicting the calmer image of St. James "the Pilgrim", by the same 18th century artist, Jose Gambino.

The Saracen-slaying image of St James, or Santiago in Spanish, is a symbol of the fight between Christianity and Islam and the reconquest of Spain from eight centuries of Moorish rule before 1492.

The saint is said to have appeared to Christian troops fighting Moorish army at the Battle of Clavijo in 844, the
crusaders rallying to the cry of "Santiago y cierra Espana" - "St James, we will reconquer Spain".

Cathedral authorities insist the timing of the decision has nothing to do with the 11 March bombings in Madrid, which an Islamic group is alleged to have carried out.
ALLEGED? The Moroccans who were arrested have confessed to planning the attack BEFORE the liberation of Iraq, AND most of the al Queda who originally got away later BLEW THEMSELVES UP, rather than be arrested by the few Spanish who still have their "complete packages"!
Alejandro Barral, president of the cultural commission for the cathedral council, told BBC News Online:

"This is not an opportunistic decision. This is not through fear of fanatics of any kind and nothing to do with 11 March or 11 September."

He said the decision was taken a few years ago, but simply had not yet been implemented.
No time like the present for appeasing muslim terorists, eh, SeÒor Barral? Did Osama promise to spare your entire family?
Mr Barral said the idea was to try to take the image of the saint back to its origins - St James as the apostle or pilgrim who took the word of Jesus to the Iberian Peninsula.

The Baroque image of a sword-wielding St James cutting the heads off Moors is not a very sensitive or evangelical image that fits the teachings of Christ, he added.

The statue, when it is eventually moved from the chapel in the cathedral, is not likely to be hidden from the six
million pilgrims and tourists who visit the city every year. It is due to take its place alongside dozens of other
images of St James in the cathedral museum.
Seems to us that the BBC and the Spanish can kneel to the muslim moon-god together!

3/26/04

Lefty journos use Preparation Hubris:
"Israel will inflame the terrorists!"


[Received via via email from a smart American Jew committed to the fight against terrorism, and sourced to Paul Greenberg,the Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial page editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette at Little
Rock.)

... various distinguished pundits, Israeli masochists, and "friends" of the Jewish state now warn that by taking such hasty action against a leader of Hamas after all these years, the Israelis will just inflame the terrorists.

That last piece of advice always brings to mind the story about the two Jews who were being stood against a wall by a Nazi execution squad. Allowed a few last words, the first Jew curses his killers, telling them they will lose the war and roast in Hell and all their crimes will be avenged and . . . then he hears the other Jew whispering in his ear: Shush! You'll make them mad.

3/15/04

Funny how the Left insisted that Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism, but no sooner was Madrid attacked by terrorists, suddenly the Left claims that Spain would have never been hit if it hadn't got involved in Iraq! Talk about pretzel logic...
Above comment and image courtesy of (and copyright by) Sacredcowburgers.com

Who would have ever believed Spaniards would get on their knees to Arab terrorist scum only days after being slaughtered by them?

Bin Laden's love song to Spain:

Don't cry for me Andalusia
When we are done with the Jews
We'll rebuild ...
The Caliphate of Cordoba.

Is Dershowitz The Perfect Useful Infidel?

Talk about chutzpah: Dershowitz almost gets hoisted by jihad-loving Leftists, but he still demands a new Sand-Nazi state carved out of Israel.

A salient passage in Alan Dershowitz's book "Chutzpah" tells of his intermittent disillusionment with the Left while at Harvard Law:

He and other Harvard law students had done some pro-bono work for "noted" Black Panther Angela Davis and other antiwar activists who had been arrested at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 1968.

When Davis was later leaving for a trip to Moscow, Dershowitz asked her to intercede for Russian Jews in the Soviet Union who were being persecuted for everything from lighting Chanukah candles to attempting to emigrate and make aliyah to Israel.

Davis turned him down, stating that she would do nothing to help "Zionist imperialists," no matter where they stood on other issues... 

Well, Perfessor, those Far-Left, Tides-Foundation(think John Kerry's wife)-funded pro-Arafat fascists you met at Faneuil Hall last week SUPPORT THE SAME INSANE DOO-DOO THAT YOU DO; creating another unneeded, combo Socialist / Sharia-based state fully capable of exporting more global terrorism.

What a shandah fur deh Yidden: Prof. Dershowitz only just found out how ruthless the leftists really are. How many more times does he need to get mugged by them, more important, how many more innocents must die at the hands of those emboldened by his over-zealous and impolite cohorts before he realizes that his goal for carving Terrorstine out of Israel's bosom is BAD FOR ISRAEL AND AMERICA?

The other day, I experienced violent anti-Semitism for the first time in my adult life. It took place in front of Faneuil Hall, the birthplace of American independence and liberty.
(Wow, violent anti-semitism: good thing they were only screaming and waving signs at you, Professor)

(click image to enlarge)
I was receiving a justice award from the Jewish Council on Public Affairs and delivering a talk on "Civil Liberties in the Age of Terrorism" from the podium of that historic hall. When I left, award in hand, I was accosted by a group of screaming, angry young men and women carrying virulently anti-Israel signs. The protest was denominated a peace event and was sponsored by a group calling themselves by the vague name ACT-MA.
[See link above, they were funded by the Tides Foundation, run by Senator John Kerry's wife).
Although the signs they were carrying were not anti-Semitic, [what a relief - Editor ] the sign carriers were shouting epithets at me that crossed the line from civility to bigotry. "Dershowitz and Hitler, just the same, the only difference is the name." The sin that, in the opinion of the screamers, warranted this comparison between me and the man who murdered dozens of my family members was my support for Israel. It was irrelevant to these chanters that I also support a Palestinian state, the end of the Israeli occupation and the dismantling of most of the settlements. [my emphasis - JP] They also shouted "Dershowitz and Gibbels [sic], just the same, the only difference is the name" - not even knowing how to pronounce the name of the anti-Semitic Nazi propagandist.
"It was irrelevant to these chanters that I also support a Palestinian state, the end of the Israeli occupation and the dismantling of most of the settlements."

Welcome to and thank you for exposing the merger of the insane AND MODERATE Left and islamo-fascism, Professor. Aside from you and these fools both completely missing the irony of your and their shared desire to make Yesha Judenrein, it's time to finish your education and see how John Kerry's wife's Tides Foundation is funding your Osama wannabe's as well as the self-loathing "moderate" left-wing Jewicides of Gush Shalom.
*********
[Note: This article was reformatted and links were repaired in 2012 but the content remains from the original post].
**************
To Stay Current With Jewpoint, 
Be Sure And Subscribe Up At The Top Of The Page!

And to share some Jewpoint,
scroll down & click on "Comments" and/or
click on a button below to share this page 
via Facebook™, email, or your favorite blog, 
social media, or bookmark service.
************** 

2/27/04

Isn't there one person at Rutgers who is embarrassed?


Embarrassed (if only for their friends, alumni and their donors!) that a propaganda film for Hamas and the "Martyr's Brigade" is being shown at Rutgers this Friday?

Isn't there one person at Rutgers who is revolted by the constant bombardment of the pro-terrorist and stalinist propaganda emanating from Rutgers and being produced under Rutger's name?

Isn't there one person with guts and honor at Rutgers who will publish a denunciation of this film, this Bin Ladenesque propaganda for terrorists?

If you are or know one such person at Rutgers, please forward the following article and link with the truth about Jenin, and the truth about the propaganda from those who cheered on 9/11.

If you ignore it, the pro-homicide bombing terrorist-organizers on the Rutgers campus get a free pass.

PS - Ask the President of Rutgers if he would tolerate the lies and slander of a film like this on his campus if it was the KKK demanding "freedom of speech;" if it was David Duke urging that black children be blown up on buses, and that a black nation be "divested" from, and wiped off the face of the earth. Or is it only terrorists who want to kill Americans and Israelis who are so favored by President McCormick's equanimity ?

Richard McCormick
President, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901
Telephone: 732/932-7454
Fax: 732/932-8060
Email: president@rutgers.edu
________________________________

The PLO Propaganda Film "Jenin, Jenin"

Frontpagemag ^ | Feb 20, 04 | Lee Kaplan


From San Francisco State to Columbia University, "Palestinian film festivals" are becoming one of the major propaganda venues for those seeking to dismantle Israel.[1]

The most widely seen of these films is "Jenin, Jenin," shot by an Israeli-Arab actor named Mohammed Bakri. "Jenin, Jenin" purports to be a documentary on the aftermath of the Jenin battle between the Israel Defense Forces and PLO terrorists that took place in `Jenin in 2002. The film has become standard fare at such screenings.

There's one major problem: the film is a fraud.

Read the rest of this excellent and concise expose of terrorist propaganda
here.


2/26/04

No muslims + no leftists = NO TERROR.

[MK] Elon responded with anger: "I know one outrageous alliance - that of leftist atheists, extremist civil-rights advocates, who walk hand-in-hand with extremist Moslem murderers in Hyde Park demonstrations and elsewhere around the world, and demonstrate against America and against Israel! This is the outrageous coalition that I know of! [interruption by MK Yossi Sarid] The extreme left-wing that exudes poison, that gives ammunition [to Israel's enemies], just like that display in Sweden [equating a woman Palestinian terrorist, depicted as Snow White, with her Israeli victims] made by an Israeli-Swede who would certainly have voted for you, MK Sarid, or one of the other [left-wing or Arab] parties here. You are the ones who nurture the current anti-Semitism, because the current anti-Semitism is led by the most extreme Islamists...


Tourism Minister Benny Elon said
that his alliance with Bible-believing
and Israeli-supporting Christians is
praiseworthy - as opposed to that
between Moslem murderers and
extreme left-wing atheists.


"Therefore, those extremists, those who continue to fight the wars of the past - who think that anti-Semitism will appear only as it has in the past, on the background of Wagner's music, MK Sarid, and only on a Christian background: Allow me to inform you that today, the place where the Protocols of the Elders of Zion [is being disseminated] and where it is the biggest best-seller, is not on any street in Europe, and not on any street in America. Today, the place where classic anti-Semitic claims are made is here, the geographic center of the People of Israel! The center of hatred for Israel is here! A large Jewish ghetto surrounded by hatred for Israel is right here!

Read the full article here.

A Vicious, Anti-Semitic Film


Produced by Syria, not Mel Gibson.

By Joel C. Rosenberg / February 25, 2004


Israeli Cabinet Minister Natan Sharansky went to Berlin in January to show German, French and
other European officials excerpts of a vicious, anti-Semitic film.

With all the media attacks on Mel Gibson and his new film, you might think Sharansky showed excerpts of The Passion of the Christ. He did not. Sharansky, for whom I briefly worked in 2000, wanted European officials to see a real anti-Semitic film. So he showed them excerpts of Al-Shatat ("The Diaspora"), a $5.1 million, 30-part "mini-series" produced by Syrian television. It was broadcast during Ramadan last year by Al-Mansar, Hezbollah's satellite television network. The film is "a Syrian TV series recording the criminal history of Zionism," according to a November 11, 2003 report in the Syria Times.

Episode Twenty of Al-Shatat ó which aired last November ó depicts a classic anti-Semitic blood libel. A Rabbi, played by an Arab actor, directs a member of his synagogue to help him:

1) kidnap the son of his Christian neighbor;
2) bring the boy to the synagogue;
3) slit the boy's throat;
4) drain the boy's blood into a basin;
5) use the blood to make Passover matzoh bread;
6) serve the matzoh to the members of the synagogue.

See the video here; Click here to read the rest of this article.

So where's Abe Foxman? 30 million American Christians are going to se Gibson's film, and 99% of them are coming out in tears. And after they get home, they are calling the WH to tell the president to support Israel.

Meanwhile a gazillion muslims see this Syrian crap and blow us up on a daily basis.

Watch the Syrian movie and tell me again Mel Gibson is the problem...

2/25/04

Why Mel Owes One to the Jews
by Rabbi Daniel Lapin
President, Toward Tradition

Two weeks before Mel Gibson's Passion flashes onto two thousand screens, online ticket merchants are reporting that up to half their total sales are for advance purchases for Passion. One Dallas multiplex has reserved all twenty of its screens for The Passion. I am neither a prophet nor a movie critic. I am merely an Orthodox rabbi using ancient Jewish wisdom to make three predictions about The Passion.

One, Mel Gibson and Icon Productions will make a great deal of money. Those distributors who surrendered to pressure from Jewish organizations and passed on Passion will be kicking themselves, while Newmarket Films will laugh all the way to the bank. Theater owners are going to love this film.

Two, Passion will become famous as the most serious and substantive Biblical movie ever made. It will be one of the most talked-about entertainment events in history, it is currently on the cover of Newsweek and Vanity Fair.

My third prediction is that the faith of millions of Christians will become more fervent as Passion uplifts and inspires them. Passion will propel vast numbers of unreligious Americans to embrace Christianity. The movie will one day be seen as a harbinger of America's third great religious reawakening.

Those Jewish organizations that have squandered both time and money futilely protesting Passion, ostensibly in order to prevent pogroms in Pittsburgh, can hardly be proud of their performance. They failed at everything they attempted. They were hoping to ruin Gibson rather than enrich him. They were hoping to suppress Passion rather than promote it. Finally, they were hoping to help Jews rather than harm them.
Read the rest of Rabbi Lapin's article here...

And here's our 5 reasons we think the goyim should go see Gibson's movie (And yes, some overlap Rabbi Lapin's).

a/ Those religious Christians who support Israel as much as (and sadly, if not more than many Jews we know) will not turn around and hate us and attack us; indeed, Foxman has sold so many tickets for them and has religious Christians who support Israel [RCWSI] so frightened that some white trash ignorant Christian might blame/attack a Jew, that THEY, the RCWSI, will stand up against it and against any violence against Jews to protect the "spiritual integrity" of the film. Call me optimistic (see (d) if I am wrong).

b/ Seeing this movie might make waffly Christians more Christian. Probably a good thing for America as we head towards trying to save what's left of traditional family values, and as the war against islamo-fascism heats up.

c/ Goyim who will walk out of this movie hating us, and h'v might attack us because of it probably hated us and harbored violent fantasies against us anyway. One drop of Jewish blood is too many, but more Jews would be hurt by shutting down and shouting down this movie.

d/ If it does get out of control, either more Jews will join Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership or we can all go make aliyah and finally depose Sharon who is now floating the notion of INVITING the Egyptian army into Gaza. You can also call me naive of many of the subtleties of ha-matzav, but after watching American Jews celebrate Rabin and Peres BRINGING BACK ARAFAT from Tunisia, I don't think I am ready for the Likud bringing in the Egyptian army.

e/ BTW, where are Foxman, Denby, Frank Rich et al screaming about WHAT'S BEING PREACHED IN MOSQUES EVERY WEEK IN AMERICA? Where were they when hundreds of thousands of left-wing, kaffiyah-wearing, hamas-loving, student-trash marched in American streets with International [C]Answer in support of Arafat, Saddam and Bin Laden? Why isn't Foxman leading the charge TO PUT REUTERS OUT OF BUSINESS for it's blind support AND ENCOURAGEMENT of terrorism against America and Israel?

2/12/04

Rabbis take cue from age-old problem...


AND APPROVE USING
PIG LARD TO STOP TERROR ATTACKS


From correspondents in Jerusalem
February 12, 2004
ISRAELI police have come up with plans to place bags
of pig lard on buses in a bid to deter Palestinian
militants from carrying out suicide attacks, the Maariv
daily reported.

Rabbinical authorities have given the idea its approval
on the grounds that it could be a life-saving measure
even though pigs are also considered impure by Jews. .


Authorities believe that the move could discourage
Palestinians from carrying out attacks as pieces of their
exploded body could come into contact with the pig fat,
prejudicing their chances of entering into paradise.

The paper said that the rabbinical dispensation could
mean that security forces also hang bags of lard in
shopping malls and schools.

Public buses have been a favourite target for Palestinian
suicide bombers since the start of the intifada in
September 2000.

Agence France-Presse

2/10/04

How do you commemorate our staving off a massacre of Jews, H"S, and the vanquishing of hundreds of thousands of our foes?


You can do it with a double mitzvah, including encouraging Olim, when you send SHALACH MANOS to friends and relatives in the U.S., Canada and Israel via Shalachmanot.com

2/3/04

Historian's Take on Islam Steers U.S. Policy:
Wall St Journal ^ | 2-02-04 | PETER WALDMAN

(The above link may require registration at the WSJ).
A Princeton historian's diagnosis of the Muslim world's malaise, and his call for a U.S. military invasion to seed democracy in the Mideast, have helped define the boldest shift in U.S. foreign policy in 50 years.

Bernard Lewis often tells audiences about an encounter he once had in Jordan. The Princeton University historian, author of more than 20 books on Islam and the Middle East, says he was chatting with Arab friends in Amman when one of them trotted out an argument familiar in that part of the world.

"We have time, we can wait," he quotes the Jordanian as saying. "We got rid of the Crusaders. We got rid of the Turks. We'll get rid of the Jews."

Hearing this claim "one too many times," Mr. Lewis says, he politely shot back, "Excuse me, but you've got your history wrong. The Turks got rid of the Crusaders. The British got rid of the Turks. The Jews got rid of the British. I wonder who is coming here next...."

Along with a brief biography of Bernard Lewis and great anecdotes of his contacts with past Israeli politicians and the current WH administration, this article is notable for it's exposure of Mr. Lewis's critics as the enemies of America and Israel:
Mideast historian Juan Cole of the University of Michigan praises Mr. Lewis's scholarly works earlier in his career but says his more-popular writings of recent years tend to caricature Muslims as poor losers, helpless and enraged.

"Mr. Cole is among those who say Mr. Lewis's call for military intervention to transform failed Muslim states risks making the culture clash between Islamic lands and the West worse."
Mr. Coles thinks we should have thrown candy at them and begged them to like us. That will always get a muslim's respect.
"So far, they say, Iraq looks more like a breeding ground for terrorism than a showcase of democracy -- not surprising, they say, given that the U.S. invaded an old and proud civilization."
Hello, THE ENTIRE MUSLIM MID-EAST is a breeding ground for terrorism! Which part of the Koran didn't Mr. Cole read?

And "an old and proud civilization"? Was that the one with Saddam Hussein's killing fields and the mass graves, or was Mr. Cole referring to the sword wielding tribesmen running around in the sand hiding from the Ottomans? Hello, BABYLON died when?
"Lewis has lived so long, he's managed to live into an era when some people in Washington are reviving empire thinking," says Mr. Cole."
What a useless apologist for terrorism this man is: ISLAM CONSIDERS ITSELF AN EMPIRE TO BE IMPOSED.
"He's never understood the realities of political and social mobilization and the ways they make empire untenable."
We understand you clearly, Mr. Cole; you want to be the dhimmie advisor who gets to sit by the pashas and the mullahs and point out which of us get hanged.
"Ilan Pappe of Haifa University says Mr. Lewis's view that political cultures can be remade through force contributed to Israel's decision to invade Lebanon in 1982."
Ilan Pappe is an degenerate communist who should be deported to hell with arafat and peres.
"It took the Israelis 18 years, and 1,000 soldiers killed, to abandon that strategy," Mr. Pappe says.
Yes, and every arab regime repeatedly states how they can wear down America the same way they wore down Israel until they ran out of Lebanon, leaving the Lebanese under the thumb of the Syrians and Hizbollah with their thousands of rockets aimed at Israel.

"Effendi, simply give little arab sex boys to the communists in the universities and the newspapers, they will write and tell their people to abandon the fight and we can destroy our enemies without firing hardly a shot."
"If the Americans operate under the same assumptions in Iraq, they'll fail the way the Israelis failed."
Ironically that's correct: If America follows Israel's ongoing appeasement madness, we will succumb to terrorists for centuries.